According to the source, BitMine Immersion now holds over $10 billion in ETH after its latest purchase, representing around 2% of Ethereum’s total supply (source: the source post). Based on the source-reported 2% stake, traders can monitor on-chain flows, exchange deposits/withdrawals, and order-book depth for potential whale-driven liquidity shifts in ETH, especially around key levels and during high-volatility sessions (source: the source post). According to the source, no wallet addresses, execution details, or custody information were provided, so traders should seek on-chain attribution or official filings to validate the position before making position-sized decisions (source: the source post).

According to @MilkRoadDaily, BitMNR purchased another $200M worth of ETH, bringing its holdings to 2.12M ETH valued around $9.3B, which represents over 1.7% of total ETH supply held by a single public company, source: @MilkRoadDaily. According to @MilkRoadDaily, the company’s stated target is to own 5% of the ETH supply, implying additional accumulation from the current 1.7% level if pursued, source: @MilkRoadDaily. According to @MilkRoadDaily, the equity angle is framed as $BMNR equals ETH exposure plus $372M in yield, which is relevant for traders evaluating equity proxies for ETH exposure, source: @MilkRoadDaily.

According to @adriannewman21, labeling a token as 100% circulating on day one can be financial engineering that concentrates supply among a few holders and misleads retail traders, source: @adriannewman21 on X, September 1, 2025. According to @adriannewman21, a low float with a high fully diluted valuation (FDV) directly signals the team will control the majority of supply, indicating centralization risk at launch, source: @adriannewman21 on X, September 1, 2025. According to @adriannewman21, traders should treat low-float, high-FDV launches as red flags when evaluating new listings, source: @adriannewman21 on X, September 1, 2025.

According to @cas_abbe, eight tracked entities hold 5.904M SOL in reserves, worth about $1.15B with SOL at $195, equal to 1.03% of the total supply, source: @cas_abbe. These reserves are concentrated among public companies in fintech, DeFi, biosciences, and mining, signaling notable exposure to a single network, source: @cas_abbe.

According to Lookonchain, wallets 0x436F and 0x2DDf now hold 109.56M INSP (about $3.98M), representing 10.96% of the total supply; source: Lookonchain on X https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1955974793842581753. Such whale concentration can influence liquidity and volatility, making it prudent for traders to track these addresses for inflow/outflow alerts; source: Binance Academy https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-are-crypto-whales.

According to Bubblemaps on Twitter, before the launch of ZEUS (0x0f7), over 15 top holders were funded through Union and 35 holders via Changenow. These wallets and their associated clusters collectively control 49% of the total token supply (source: Bubblemaps, May 28, 2025). This concentrated ownership significantly increases the risk of price volatility and potential sell-offs, making it crucial for crypto traders to closely monitor large wallet activity and associated on-chain movements for ZEUS.

According to @intotheblock, long-term SHIB holders collectively own more than 80% of the total supply. This substantial ownership concentration suggests resilience among SHIB investors, which could imply stability in price action despite challenges in the memecoin market. Traders should consider this ownership distribution as a factor for potential reduced volatility.

According to glassnode, as Bitcoin's price dropped, buyer interest emerged, but the supply between $93K–$83K remains sparse. The largest supply concentrations are at $84.2K with 23K BTC, $86.9K with 25.8K BTC held by long-term investors, and $88.9K with 46K BTC mostly inactive. This indicates potential resistance levels for traders to watch.

According to Bubblemaps, a single address identified as H2rCK acquired 90% of a cryptocurrency's total supply and subsequently redistributed it across more than 150 addresses, suggesting strategic distribution. This action indicates potential manipulation or preparation for liquidity events, which could impact market volatility and available supply. Traders should monitor these addresses for unusual trading activities.